Voting and Redistricting Lawsuit News
 Back to Voting Rights and Redistricting Lawsuit News
South Dakota Settles Largest-Ever Voting Rights Lawsuit Brought by ACLU on
Behalf of Native Americans
From the NY ACLU:
South Dakota Settles Largest-Ever Voting Rights Lawsuit Brought by ACLU on
Behalf of Native Americans
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Richard Alleyne, ACLU
National Press Office
November 7, 2002
RAPID CITY, SD--After nearly 30 years of ignoring a federal law meant to
protect Native Americans from voting discrimination, state and county
officials here have agreed to obtain Justice Department approval of more
than 600 statutes and regulations that affect elections in the state, the
American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project announced today.
"This historic settlement will remove some of the discriminatory barriers
Native Americans have faced at the ballot box and ensure that their voting
rights will be better protected in the future," said Bryan Sells, a staff
attorney with the ACLU's Voting Rights Project and lead counsel in the
lawsuit that led to the settlement.
"The unprecedented level of Native American participation in Tuesday's
election is further evidence that Native Americans are finally beginning to
overcome the voting discrimination -- past and present -- that has
historically shut them out of the political process," he added.
If approved by the court, the agreement will settle a sweeping lawsuit,
Elaine Quick Bear Quiver et al. v. Joyce Hazeltine et al., filed in August
on behalf of two Lakota elders and two tribal officials residing in Todd and
Shannon counties. The lawsuit sought to enforce Section 5 of the Voting
Rights Act of 1965, which requires certain states or parts of states,
counties and municipalities to get federal approval or preclearance of their
new voting laws or practices before they can be implemented.
Under the terms of today's settlement, also known as a consent order, the
state must, among other things:
* Obtain Justice Department approval of any changes in voting
practices or procedures enacted after November 1, 1972, when Section 5 of
the Voting Rights Act took effect;
* Refrain from implementing two statutes ACLU attorneys flagged as
being particularly harmful to Native Americans unless and until they have
obtained preclearance;
* Implement, under the supervision of a magistrate judge, a remedial
plan that provides for the orderly submission of all unprecleared voting
changes in accordance with Section 5 and provides the ACLU and their clients
the opportunity to monitor the state's compliance with the remedial plan and
the consent order.
"This is a first step toward correcting a system that has alienated my
people from the political process for decades," said Alfred Bone Shirt, a
Lakota activist and named plaintiff in the ACLU lawsuit. "The eyes of the
nation should be on South Dakota. We must hold the state's nose to the
grindstone so future compliance is guaranteed and Indian empowerment
insured."
The settlement was signed by Joyce Hazeltine, South Dakota's Secretary of
State, and Susan Pahlke and Lance Russell, attorneys for Todd and Shannon
counties, respectively. The settlement must now be approved by a three-judge
panel of the federal district court before the conditions become binding.
"By agreeing to comply with the Voting Rights Act, South Dakota takes one
more step toward achieving a fair and open process -- something that our
clients want, the state needs and democracy demands," said Jennifer Ring,
Executive Director of the ACLU of the Dakotas. "When folks in Bennett County
can finally elect a Sheriff who promises not to engage in racial profiling,
they can change their lives and the lives of their children and
grandchildren," she added.
The ACLU first became aware of South Dakota's noncompliance with Section 5
when the state legislature failed to submit their 2001 legislative
redistricting plan to the Attorney General for preclearance. The ACLU filed
a separate lawsuit (Alfred Boneshirt et al. v. Joyce Hazeltine et al.) which
challenged other violations and sought compliance from the state for the
redistricting plan. Earlier this year, a federal district court ruled that
South Dakota officials violated Section 5 by failing to obtain preclearance
before implementing the new plan.
Patrick Duffy of Rapid City is serving as ACLU cooperating attorney in this
case.
home : mission statement : contact : site map : search : store : links
DLN coalition : DLN issues : DLN nation : Any reprints are under the Fair Use doctrine of international copyright law : See http://www.dlncoalition.org/fair_use.htm.
|
Photograph--Alfred Bone Shirt Sr. wearing a peace medal.